top of page
  • Writer's pictureAlpesh Patel

The Perils of Mismanaged Pension Funds

In the realm of pension funds, few topics generate as much discussion and scrutiny as the performance of managed funds versus the simplicity and efficiency of index tracking. This week, our focus shifts to a well-known entity in the UK pension sector, St. James's Place. Often criticised for its underwhelming performance, a closer examination reveals a broader narrative worth discussing.

St. James's Place, a perennial topic in pension fund discussions, has once again come under the spotlight. With a substantial fund size of £4 billion, expectations for this pension fund are understandably high. However, a detailed look at its performance metrics since 2015 paints a less than flattering picture, especially when compared to broader market indices.

Performance Discrepancy: A Closer Look

Over the past decade, St. James's Place has reported a return of 54%, a figure that starkly contrasts with the gains seen in major indices. For context, the NASDAQ surged by an astonishing 405%, the Indian market by 209%, the S&P 500 by 177%, and the Dow Jones by 143% over the same period. This discrepancy raises significant questions about the fund's investment strategies and management efficiency.

The fund's recent performance further highlights this gap. Over one year, it achieved a 4% return; over three years, 16%; and over five years, 20%. When compared to the index performance of 70% over a similar timeframe, the difference is not just noticeable but alarming.

Investment Strategy: A Point of Contention

Critics argue that St. James's Place's investment approach, heavily focused on FTSE 100 companies, lacks the innovation and diversification needed in today's volatile markets. The global financial landscape has seen exponential growth in various sectors and geographies, a fact underscored by the impressive gains in markets such as NASDAQ and the Indian stock market. This raises the question: why has St. James's Place not capitalised on these opportunities?

Management Under Microscope

The management team at St. James's Place, including figures like Luke, Kevin, Nick, and others, faces scrutiny for what many see as an overly conservative or misdirected strategy. With a large team purportedly managing what some critics describe as a relatively straightforward task, the fund's underperformance has become a focal point for those advocating for a more aggressive or diversified investment approach.

The Way Forward: A Call for Change

The critique suggests a radical shift in strategy might be overdue. Instead of spreading investments thinly across a wide array of companies, a more concentrated approach, focusing on a select few with high growth potential, is recommended. This "all-in" strategy, while riskier, could potentially yield higher returns, challenging the fund's current conservative stance.


The performance of St. James's Place's pension fund serves as a case study in the ongoing debate between managed funds and index tracking. With the financial world evolving rapidly, pension funds like St. James's Place must adapt to remain competitive and fulfill their promise to investors. As the discussion continues, it's clear that for many, the fund's current trajectory is a call to action, urging a reevaluation of strategies to better serve its stakeholders.

Alpesh Patel OBE


bottom of page