top of page

Fundsmith Pension Review: A Masterclass in Mediocrity in Pension Investing

  • Writer: Alpesh Patel
    Alpesh Patel
  • Feb 13
  • 5 min read

Updated: Mar 21

Alpesh Patel OBE on why leading investment funds underperform market returns for pension investors

Here we will do a Fundsmith Pension Review. The chart below tells the story better than any glossy marketing brochure. Over the five years from September 2020 to September 2025, the Fundsmith Equity Fund - once feted as the “go-to” active fund for long-term investors - has returned a cumulative 32.8%. That sounds respectable until you run the maths. Whether you hold Fundsmith in your SIPP, ISA, or workplace pension, the numbers tell the same story.

Alpesh Patel OBE is a hedge fund manager, Bloomberg TV alumnus, Financial Times author, and former Visiting Fellow at Corpus Christi College, Oxford. He has mentored hundreds of UK pension investors through the Great Investments Programme at campaignforamillion.com.


Fundsmith pension fund 5-year performance chart GBP September 2020 to September 2025 showing 32.8% cumulative return

Fundsmith Pension Performance Review: The Maths That Matters

Graph compares Fundsmith vs Vanguard returns, highlights issues like performance gaps, market benchmarks, cash buffers, diversification, risk.

Total return: +32.8%

Period: 5 years

The compound annual growth rate (CAGR) is calculated as:


CAGR formula showing Fundsmith pension fund 5-year CAGR calculation resulting in 5.8% annualised return

That’s the cold, hard fact.

Now, compare this with the benchmarks:

  • MSCI World Index (GBP total return): ~13.0% annualised over the same period.

  • FTSE All-Share (total return): ~11.5% annualised.

Fundsmith managed just 5.8%. Less than half what you would have achieved by simply buying a cheap global tracker. Data as at September 2025.

The Problem with “Protecting Capital”

Infographic titled "Why Big Funds Struggle with Cash in Crashes." Shows a piggy bank, falling arrow, cash machine, spiral staircase, and dollar signs.

The defence from Terry Smith’s camp at Fundsmith is always the same: risk-adjusted returns. The fund has historically boasted a higher Sortino ratio (0.87 vs MSCI World’s 0.60), meaning it has delivered more return per unit of “bad volatility”. In English: you suffer less when the market falls.


Text describing market flaws in 2022: asset sales, rigid rules, and slow recovery. Contains icons and paragraphs explaining each point.

But here’s the rub. The world’s investors don’t live on ratios – they live on pounds, dollars and euros. And from 2020 to 2025, the opportunity cost of being in Fundsmith was enormous. A £100,000 investment grew to just £132,800. The same sum in MSCI World? Around £184,000. That’s a £51,000 gap in five years.

That is not “protecting capital” – it’s leaving money on the table.

Style Drift and Missed Upside

Infographic on how over-diversification dilutes fund returns, detailing five points on risks and impacts, with yellow icons and text blocks.

Fundsmith’s philosophy, championed by manager Terry Smith, of buying quality companies at reasonable prices is sound. But style matters. In an era when global growth was led by US megacap tech, a refusal to own the winners meant consistent underperformance.

In 2024 alone, Fundsmith returned +8.9%, while MSCI World roared ahead with +20.8%. That isn’t downside protection. That’s missing the rally.


Aerial view of five people discussing on a tiled floor, surrounded by text on conservative investing strategies of Fundsmith and Vanguard.

Why Pension Investors Should Be Concerned


Yellow text on a white background explains Eugene Fama's research on fund performance, agency problems, and diversification limits.

Terry Smith’s Fundsmith pension investing strategy has always prided itself on beating the market since inception in 2010 - roughly +2.7% per year over MSCI World. But the past five years show that the halo is slipping. When markets are rising and other funds are compounding double-digit annual returns, a mid-single-digit return feels like mediocrity dressed up as prudence.

The danger is psychological. Investors read the brochures, hear the mantra “do nothing, own quality”, and assume they are safe. But safety, in this case, meant losing out on half the gains of a boring global index fund.

Should You Keep Fundsmith in Your Pension?

If you bought Fundsmith five years ago, you effectively paid active-fund fees (1.04% per year) to achieve half the return of passive investing. The maths is simple, the chart damning. Terry Smith’s fund may still claim the moral high ground on risk-adjusted returns, but for wealth creation — particularly inside a SIPP or ISA where compounding matters most — the strategy has been a disappointment.


Chart comparing Fundsmith and Vanguard performance. Highlights issues with cash holdings, allocation limits, and market crash behavior.

If you want smooth sailing, create your own low volatility, high growth stock portfolio. If you want growth, buy the index with growth stocks. If you want neither, buy Fundsmith.


Yellow and white slide titled "Why Individual Investors Must Rethink Fund Choices" with insights on fund constraints, mandates, and risk tolerance.

Frequently Asked Questions: Fundsmith Pension Investing

Is Fundsmith good for a pension?

Based on the last five years of data, Fundsmith has significantly underperformed the MSCI World index in a pension context. With a CAGR of just 5.8% versus 13% for the index, pension savers holding Fundsmith in a SIPP or workplace pension have missed substantial compounding gains. Long-term savers may find a low-cost global tracker more effective for retirement wealth building.

Should I sell Fundsmith in 2025/2026?

This article is for educational purposes and does not constitute personal financial guidance. However, the data shows Fundsmith has ranked 449th out of 512 funds in the IA Global sector over one year. Anyone reviewing their pension should compare their current fund’s returns against a simple MSCI World tracker before deciding.

Is Fundsmith better than a tracker fund?

Over the five years to September 2025, a cheap MSCI World tracker fund outperformed Fundsmith by over 7% per year on an annualised basis. Fundsmith charges 1.04% per year versus as little as 0.07–0.22% for passive tracker alternatives. On a £100,000 pension pot, that performance gap equates to over £51,000 in lost growth over five years.

What is Fundsmith’s annual charge?

The Fundsmith Equity Fund’s ongoing charge figure (OCF) is approximately 1.04% per year for the T class shares — higher than the IA Global sector average of 0.84%. Platform fees such as Hargreaves Lansdown’s 0.45% are charged on top. By comparison, a Vanguard FTSE All-World ETF charges just 0.22% per year.

What are the best alternatives to Fundsmith for UK pension investors?

For passive exposure, low-cost MSCI World trackers from Vanguard, HSBC, or iShares have significantly outperformed Fundsmith over five years. For those who prefer an active approach with better recent results, Rathbone Global Opportunities and BNY Mellon Long-Term Global Equity offer quality-focused alternatives. UK pension savers may also consider building a bespoke portfolio of individual stocks using a quantitative selection framework — see the Great Investments Programme for more information.

If you hold Fundsmith in your pension and want to know what a better-constructed portfolio would look like, book a free pension review at campaignforamillion.com — Alpesh’s team will analyse your current fund and show you the difference.

Alpesh Patel OBE with declining red graph overlay. Text: Demand transparency, review your pension portfolio, visit campaignforamillion.com.

Sources:


Disclaimer: This content is opinion based on the disclosed facts and sources above, including fund factsheets, benchmark data, and publicly available filings as at time of publication. An honest person could hold this opinion on those facts (Defamation Act 2013, s.3). I publish this in the public interest to inform UK savers about costs, risk, and performance of widely‑marketed products (s.4). This article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment guidance. The data presented is sourced from publicly available information believed to be accurate as of September 2025, but no warranty is made regarding its completeness or reliability. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. All investments carry risk, including the possible loss of capital. Investors should conduct their own research or consult a regulated financial professional before making investment decisions.



Comments


Internship/Work Experience

For Social Mobility

As the CEO of an Asset Management Company, with a Hedge Fund and Private Equity Fund, I want anyone who would like it to have access to my free structured remote internship. You can do it alongside any other work experience in your own time to give maximum flexibility.

Get in touch

Alpesh Patel Ventures Limited and Praefinium Partnerns Ltd:

84 Brook St Mayfair London W1K 5EH

  • LinkedIn
  • Youtube
  • TikTok
  • Telegram
  • Instagram
  • Flickr

ALL INVESTING CARRIES RISK. PAST IS NOT GUARANTEE OF FUTURE. NOT FINANCIAL ADVICE. EDUCATION AND INFORMATION ONLY. ©2026 Alpesh Patel Ventures Limited. 84 Brook St, Mayfair, London, W1K 5EH. Alpesh Patel is Founding CEO of Praefinium Partners Ltd which is (Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority)  PLEASE READ THIS IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE               

Privacy Policy: 

This website is for educational purposes only. We do not provide personal investment advice or act as a regulated investment adviser. Any reference to investments or financial performance is illustrative and not a recommendation. If unsure, please consult a financial adviser authorised by the FCA. Communications may include financial promotions which are only intended for individuals who meet self-certification requirements under the UK Financial Promotion Order 2005. We respect your privacy and are committed to protecting your personal data. When you visit this website or register for our services, we may collect your name, email, IP address, and browsing behaviour. This data is used solely to deliver the services you've requested (e.g., course access, investment updates) and improve your experience. We do not sell or share your data with third parties for marketing. We store data securely and comply with UK GDPR regulations. You can request to delete your data at any time. 

TERMS OF USE: The content is for educational purposes only and does not constitute personal financial advice. We do not offer regulated investment advice, and we are not responsible for any financial decisions made based on our content. Any unauthorised copying, reuse, or redistribution of our material is prohibited. 

DISCLAIMER:  Investing involves risk. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. The information provided is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, financial advice. All testimonials reflect individual experiences and do not guarantee outcomes. You should conduct your own due diligence or consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions. We do not accept liability for any loss or damage incurred from reliance on any material provided.  Disclaimer & Terms of Use   Privacy Policy

bottom of page